Search for: "Ford v. General Motors,LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:57 pm by Larry
Frankly, I am not sure that is correct but I am just giving you what the court said.Horizon Lines LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Pneumo Abex LLC, looked at whether a trial court acted appropriately in sustaining a Frye challenge. 'Frye v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Pneumo Abex LLC, looked at whether a trial court acted appropriately in sustaining a Frye challenge. 'Frye v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:25 pm
In that case, Ford Motor Company decided to ignore a design flaw that caused Ford Pintos to catch fire when involved in accidents. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
Rented or leased motor vehicle safety responsibility(a) In general. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Baby you CA drive my KA General Court judgment in Ford Motor Company v OHIM, Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The plaintiff’s complaint unsurprisingly had to name nearly two dozen defendants, from General Motors, to Daimler Chrysler, to Ford, to Napa Auto Parts, to Pneumo Abex, successor of American Brake Shoe and Foundry, founded 1902. [read post]